1953: the Good Old Days |
Fellow Catholic
blogger RAnn at This That and the Other Thing recently published a post called
“Catholic Schools – Should We Have Them?” [here]. She raises some interesting points, and asks
a number of questions well worth asking, in particular “whether we as a church
should be investing so many resources in our schools”. Let me say at the outset that I have a lot of
experience in this area: I have taught in Catholic High Schools for the past
twenty-seven years; at the same time, I attended both Catholic and public
schools (I graduated from a public high school), and my own children are
home-schooled, so I’m drawing on a wide range of experience. While there are
definitely things that Catholic schools can and should do better, I would argue
that they are more important than ever.
I’d like to start
with a point on which I respectfully disagree with RAnn. She had been reviewing a book on the
integration of segregated schools in the 1950’s and 60’s, and points out that the
first black students in the previously all-white schools had a very hard time
of it: she ties that to the question of whether to send her children to public
or to Catholic schools. “In both cases”, she says, “I think there is a choice
that is right for society and a different choice that may be right for
individual kids.” I don’t think the
analogy holds. In the case of
integration, black students had been unjustly deprived of choice of schools, and
forced to attend inferior ones; integration really did put them into better schools, despite the hardships and indignities suffered
by the first black students to integrate; superior schools at least potentially gave them more and better options
later in life, and of course paved the way for a much better educational
outcome for those who followed them. The
temporary disadvantages were for the sake of future benefit not just for
society as a whole, but for those children themselves.
The question of
whether to choose a public or private school for your children today is very
different. As I argue below, putting them into a public
rather than a Catholic school may in fact be to the detriment of society as a whole, and very often means putting them into a worse
school, rather than a better. Catholic schools have always out-performed
public schools in every measurable academic category, as long such categories
have been measured (see here and here). My own experience backs this up: I’ve taught
Latin and English in three different high schools in three different states,
all of which they all draw students from a wide area and from a wide number of
grammar and middle schools, and I have consistently found the Catholic school
students much more prepared for high school level language study than the
students from the public schools.
Also, in light of the
integration issue, it’s worth noting that minority students derive particular
benefit from Catholic schools: they are much more likely to graduate from high
school than their peers in public schools, and two and one half times
more likely to attend college (here).
Catholic schools, in fact, have long been recognized as an unparalleled path to
success for minority students, and their closure has a more profound impact on these
students than on other students (here). So, if we’re talking about Catholic schools
in the context of the civil rights era integration of the public schools, we
might point out that Catholic schools, by effectively preparing African
American and other minority students to participate successfully in society as
adults, do an excellent job of accomplishing what was the primary purpose of
school integration in the first place.
In this regard, supporting Catholic schools is good for both the
individual students and society as a whole.
What is true for
minority students is true for all other students as well: the purpose of
education is to prepare them for adulthood. From society’s point of view, the end of
education is that children are good and productive citizens. We Catholics want the same, but we also have a higher aim: we want our
children to be formed into moral and faith-filled adults. This is even more important than intellectual
excellence; it is better to be illiterate before the Throne of God than to be
the smartest man in Hell. Happily, as we saw above, Catholic education in fact
does a superior job of training the intellect, but its primary purpose is to
point the students under its care in the direction of sainthood.
If we remember
that we’re talking about formation and not simply instruction, the case for
specifically Catholic schools becomes even clearer. We are corporeal beings, unlike the Angels
(see here), and as students
we are formed by the entire school environment as much as we are by
the content of the curriculum. When I
last attended public schools three and a half decades ago they were already
committed to a secularist worldview, and had already abandoned any effort to
teach the natural virtues. Today’s
public schools have gone beyond that, and beyond where they were even twenty or
fifteen years ago to the point where many of them have Planned Parenthood, the
world’s largest abortion provider and a zealous fornication promoter (take a
look here get a feel for
their agenda) providing “health” instruction; an increasing number are
instituting mandatory “diversity” classes. The courts in some states have ruled
there is no right to exempt your children from objectionable classes. Add on top of that an environment that crushes
any dissent on various leftist enthusiasms from global warming (or is it now
“climate change”?) to gay marriage. That's before we even start to talk about the whole Common Core fiasco. We’re
kidding ourselves if we think that our children will absorb the good things and
somehow be immune to the bad things. I’ve heard the argument that “we went to
public schools and we came out all right.”
First of all, as I pointed out above, these are not your father’s public
schools, or even your children’s father’s public schools; also, quite frankly,
not all of us do come out all right: I know plenty of people who didn’t, and
speaking for myself, there were experiences and hard-to-shed habits I picked up
in my public high school that I could have done without.
One might counter that Catholic schools have their imperfections as well: there may well be
administrators and teachers who undermine the Faith; as a practical matter, a
school of any size will need to hire people who are not practicing Catholics to
fill some positions, and as is the case in any school, the peer group will
exercise a powerful formative influence, and many, probably most, students will
be there not from religious devotion, but in order to benefit from the safer
environment and the superior academic rigor.
It was partly for these reasons (we wanted our children to model
themselves on us rather than their peers), but also because we wanted to have
more control over the process, that my lovely bride and I decided to home
school our children. Most people are not
going to go that route, however, and for all their unavoidable imperfections,
good Catholic schools provide an environment where Christ is at the center, the
Catholic faith is both taught and lived out, and moral excellence is
promoted.
I don’t think
it’s fair, reasonable or, frankly, even safe to send our not-fully-formed
children into the public school system and expect them to appreciably improve
the environment there in the face of a peer culture that is hostile to
religious faith and a system that ever more aggressively proselytizes for
extreme secularism; all but the most heroic are more likely to be converted
themselves. They have a better chance to
be successful evangelizers as well-formed adult Catholics. Also, a good Catholic school will not only bring
some at least of the Catholic students from lukewarm families into a closer relationship
with Christ and his Church, but will also convert some of its non-Catholic
students. In the school where I
currently teach we typically see several of these students receive the
Sacraments of Initiation and enter the Church at the last school Mass of the
year. Even those not converted will at least be "levened" by the experience, a levening they will bring with them throughout life.
There’s a lot
more that can be said on this topic, and this is already a long post, so here’s
my final point: it might well be the case that the traditional model of the
parish school is no longer viable, but that’s no reason to abandon Catholic
Education itself in a culture that is rapidly shedding its Christian
heritage. We need to find structures
that fit the times. Already a growing
number of homeschooling families are participating in a wide variety of groups and organizations; some families in
my area have actually created their own school, independent of any official Church
body; and it may well be that the new ecclesial movements that are doing so
much to energize other parts of the Body of Christ will have something to
contribute here. We need to be open to
the Holy Spirit and, as Saint John Paul II often said (and as it says many
times in scripture), be not afraid. This
is not the time to abandon Catholic education.
No comments:
Post a Comment