A defiant group
of Englishmen and Scots-Irish who were tired of getting pushed around made a
formal announcement 238 years ago today that they had had enough, that they
were declaring independence from Great Britain and her grasping monarch, George
III (to my British friends out there, by the way, no hard feelings – I think
we’ve smoothed things over since, especially in the war begun a hundred years
ago this summer, and even more so the in one that followed a few decades
after). Here’s how that document, the Declaration of Independence, begins:
When, in the course of human
events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bonds
which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the
earth, the separate and equal station to which the laws of nature and of
nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires
that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
“The laws of nature and nature’s God”. Here’s an extraordinary thing: they were
going above the head of the king, as it were, and appealing to God for
justice. Likewise in the next paragraph:
We hold these truths to be
self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their
Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and
the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are
instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the
governed.
So, governments
exist only by God’s leave, and their purpose is to protect the people’s
God-given rights. The end result of this
idea can only be a republic, and a republic was formally codified eleven years
later in the U.S. Constitution, but this was to be a republic different from those
that had gone before: while technically the sovereignty belonged to the people,
the true Sovereign was God himself. And yet it was not a theocracy: the
protection of individual freedoms demanded that the citizens individually be
governed by God’s law in pursuit of their individual interest. That is what John Adams meant when he said (I
won’t quote directly this time; if you’re familiar with this blog you’ve seen
the quote) that the U.S. Constitution was fit only for a moral and religious
people. In the absence of religious
faith (particularly Christian faith), citizens without a sure moral compass
make a people incapable of self-government.
We can see how
true this is simply by looking around us.
There have been several periods in American history referred to as the
Great Awakenings, dramatic revivals of religious faith. In the past half century we seem (both in the
U.S. and other Western nations) to be going through a Big Sleep, a dramatic
decline in religious belief. At the same
time we see an equally precipitous decline in morals, a rapid disintegration of
the family, and a growing and ever more coercive state eager to step in and
make more of our decisions for us. It’s
worth pointing out that our growing weakness as a culture is also a major
factor in the growing boldness of jihadists and others eager to complete our
downfall. People unwilling or unable to
govern themselves are incapable of directing the government of the state; the
end result can only be tyranny.
The Declaration
ends with a final invocation to the sovereignty of God. The document concludes:
We, therefore, the representatives
of the United States of America, in General Congress, assembled, appealing to the
Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the
name, and by the authority of the good people of these colonies, solemnly
publish and declare, that these united colonies are, and of right ought to be
free and independent states . . . And for the support of this declaration, with
a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to
each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.
I submit that unless we are equally willing to submit to the
“Supreme Judge of the world”, and ready to pledge our “lives, our fortunes and
our sacred honor”, we will find ourselves under the weight of a despotism
heavier than anything George III could have imagined.
No comments:
Post a Comment