In my two previous posts on this topic I discussed criteria to use in
choosing poems for Catholic home schooled students. There’s another
very important consideration, one that functions mostly on the level of the
unconscious: what is the form of the poem telling them? Poems, even
poems that we don’t think of as “narrative”, tell a story: there is a beginning
and an end. There should be a coherent progression from the one to the
other. Again, I am not suggesting that images or information cannot be
fragmentary or obscure; after all, part of what draws us into a poem is the
challenge of putting the pieces together, which is why a poem is not just a
story but an experience.
What sort of experience, then, is the poem creating for them? My point is that we ought to be able to put the pieces together: there must be coherence. Just as a piece of music that ends abruptly, or on a dissonant note, leaves us with a dissatisfied feeling that the music is incomplete, so too a poem that does not combine its elements in a meaningful way.
What sort of experience, then, is the poem creating for them? My point is that we ought to be able to put the pieces together: there must be coherence. Just as a piece of music that ends abruptly, or on a dissonant note, leaves us with a dissatisfied feeling that the music is incomplete, so too a poem that does not combine its elements in a meaningful way.
By way of example, we might also want to
consider church architecture. The church building
was traditionally
considered a microcosm, literally a mini-universe (from the Greek micros
= small, cosmos = universe). The harmony of the
architectural elements working together was intended to represent the coherence
of God’s creation, with columns and soaring arches drawing our eyes upward past
stars and angels, all the way to the apex representing the Creator Himself.
Most of the time, of course, we don’t consciously analyze the
architecture, but we feel the order and experience it on an unconscious level.
The medieval cathedrals have been called ‘sermons in stone” precisely
because they show worshippers, at a very deep level, the beauty and order of
God’s universe. One of the chief criticisms of much modern church
architecture is not only that it is ugly, but that by employing disjointed and
seemingly random elements it preaches an incoherent and meaningless universe.
In fact, its incoherence is in large part why it is ugly, because order is an essential element in
true beauty (an observation which would have been considered obvious and
unremarkable up until a century or so ago).
Basilica of SS. Peter and Paul, Lewiston, ME |
"The Heavens declare the glory of God, the skies proclaim the work of his hands" -Psalm 19:1. As with the church building, so with the poem.
It can teach our children, on the deepest level, either that the universe
is a coherent and beautiful place, even if stained by original sin; on the other
hand, it can create an experience of a world that is random, meaningless and
fragmentary. If we want our children to become adults who feel at home in
a universe that “proclaims the glory of God”, we should immerse them in poetry
of the first sort.
No comments:
Post a Comment